5 Captcha Alternatives To Hunt Down Spambots

CAPTCHAs (Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart) were initially designed to protect websites from spam and abuse by automated bots. They work by presenting challenges that are easy for humans to solve but difficult for machines, such as recognizing distorted text or solving simple puzzles. By doing this, they ensure that only human users can access certain areas of a website or complete specific actions, such as submitting a form or posting a comment.

The need for Captcha alternatives and their benefits

Despite their effectiveness in deterring bots, CAPTCHAs have their drawbacks. They can be frustrating and time-consuming for users, leading to a negative user experience and potential abandonment of a website or task. Additionally, CAPTCHAs are not always accessible for people with visual impairments or other disabilities. As businesses look for more user-friendly methods to protect their websites, the demand for CAPTCHA alternatives has grown.

CAPTCHA alternatives aim to provide a better user experience while maintaining effective spam protection. These alternatives often reduce the time and effort required to prove one’s humanity, leading to a smoother browsing experience. By adopting user-friendly spam prevention methods, businesses can reduce user frustration, improve accessibility, and potentially increase conversion rates, all without sacrificing security.

Anti-spam honeypot

A honeypot is a hidden field in your form that should not be filled out by humans (and should be empty when submitted), but will be automatically filled out by bots and then used to identify spam. The theory is simple: If the honeypot field contains data, it must be a bot — and if it’s a bot, we can ignore its submission.

Here’s are two ways how you can implement a simple honeypot:

1. Add an empty input field to your web form. This is the honey pot field; this is the one that only bots can see. You should hide it from human visitors with CSS or JavaScript. Human visitors should not even know that it exists.

Here’s an example:

<input type=”text” name=”name” /> <!– human-readable field –>

<input type=”text” name=”hp” class=”hp” /> <!– hidden field for spam bots–>

Here is the CSS to hide the field



        opacity: 0;

        position: absolute;

        top: 0;

        left: 0;

        height: 0;

        width: 0;

        z-index: -1;



2. Give the honey pot field a name like email_address or homepage_url . These are spammy names to give fields because no legitimate visitor would ever put their email address into an email_address field or their own URL into a homepage_url field. Spammers often try to trick us by putting their own URLs into those fields, so we should use those as our honey pots instead of legitimate fields like name or company.

Pros and cons: Advantages of the Honeypot technique include its simplicity and effectiveness in catching unsophisticated bots. It does not require additional user interaction, making it a more user-friendly alternative to traditional CAPTCHAs. However, the Honeypot technique has its limitations. More advanced bots may be able to detect and bypass the hidden fields, rendering the technique less effective. Additionally, the Honeypot method may inadvertently block users who use browser extensions that automatically fill out forms.

Time-based forms

Time-based form submission analysis is a method of spam prevention that evaluates the time it takes for a user to complete and submit a form. This technique is based on the premise that human users take a certain amount of time to read, comprehend, and respond to form fields, while bots can complete them almost instantaneously.

When a user accesses a form, a timestamp is recorded. Once the form is submitted, the time elapsed between loading the form and submitting it is calculated. If the form is completed too quickly, it is likely that a bot has submitted the form, and the submission is marked as spam. The threshold for determining whether a submission is spam can be adjusted according to the complexity of the form and expected human response times.

Pros and cons: The advantages of time-based form submission analysis include its unobtrusive nature, as it does not require additional user input or interaction. This makes it a more user-friendly alternative to CAPTCHAs. However, there are some disadvantages to this method. Determining an appropriate threshold for submission times can be challenging, as response times may vary significantly among users. Furthermore, this technique may not be as effective against more sophisticated bots that can mimic human-like behavior by intentionally delaying their form submissions.

Invisible reCAPTCHA

Invisible reCAPTCHA is a spam prevention method developed by Google that adds an additional layer of security to your website forms without requiring user interaction. It is designed to be unobtrusive, functioning in the background to detect and block automated bots.

Invisible reCAPTCHA works by analyzing user behavior on a website, such as mouse movements and clicks, to determine whether the user is human or a bot. If the system suspects that the user is a bot, it may present a challenge, such as identifying objects in a series of images. If the user passes the challenge, the form submission proceeds as normal; otherwise, the submission is blocked.

Pros and cons: The primary advantage of Invisible reCAPTCHA is that it provides a user-friendly experience, as it does not require user interaction unless a challenge is presented. This makes it less intrusive compared to traditional CAPTCHAs. However, some disadvantages include potential privacy concerns, as the system collects user behavior data, and occasional false positives, where legitimate users are mistakenly identified as bots

Biometric Verification

Biometric verification is a method of verifying a user’s identity using unique biological characteristics, such as fingerprints or facial recognition. This technology can be used as an alternative to CAPTCHAs to prevent automated spam and enhance security. Biometric verification works by capturing a user’s unique biological traits, such as a fingerprint or facial features, and comparing them to stored data to confirm the user’s identity. For example, a user may be prompted to scan their fingerprint or take a selfie to access a form or complete a transaction.

Pros and cons: Advantages of biometric verification include its high level of security, as it relies on unique individual characteristics that are difficult to replicate or forge. Additionally, it provides a seamless user experience, as it does not require users to remember passwords or solve CAPTCHAs. Disadvantages of biometric verification include potential privacy concerns, as users may be hesitant to share their biometric data, and the need for specialized hardware, such as fingerprint scanners or cameras, which may not be readily available for all users.

Two-Factor Authentication (2FA)

Two-factor authentication (2FA) is a security process that requires users to provide two separate forms of identification to verify their identity. This method can be used to protect sensitive information and transactions, as well as to prevent spam by adding an additional layer of security.

2FA typically involves combining something the user knows, such as a password, with something the user possesses, such as a mobile device. Common 2FA methods include SMS codes sent to the user’s phone or codes generated by an authenticator app. The user must enter the correct code in addition to their password to gain access to the protected resource.

Pros and cons: The main advantage of 2FA is that it significantly enhances security, as it requires attackers to compromise two separate factors to gain unauthorized access. This makes it more difficult for bots and hackers to breach protected systems. However, 2FA can be inconvenient for users, as it requires additional steps to complete a transaction or access a form. Additionally, some 2FA methods, such as SMS codes, can be vulnerable to interception or SIM-swapping attacks.

We’ve made your life easy with formX’s anti-spam feature

If you think these methods are too cumbersome, worry not. formX, our complete form backend solution takes care of implementing honeypots. It makes the field invisible with Javascript. It also does not take into account spam submissions in the monthly submissions quota. Want to give formX a spin? Try it here!

Read more:

What are form end points

Get more from your forms by optimizing them

The only guide to web form security you’ll need in 2023

Traditional chatbots vs LLM chatbots

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top